case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-02 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2557 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-03 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly this.

Star Trek was never about the science either, it was all about the social science aspects. (race relations, international relations, the treatment of women) So I don't get how Star Trek counts but Hunger Games doesn't? Except space?

I'd also consider the Marvel movies soft sci fi-- as someone else said the Iron Man suit is plausible, all the asgardians are actually aliens, and you see all kinds of casual technology we don't have yet. It's just more Flash Gordon/Star Wars/pulp magazine/tabloid weird type sci fi than hard sci fi.