case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-02 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2557 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ecoerrante: (Default)

Re: How do you guys define sci-fi and fantasy?

[personal profile] ecoerrante 2014-01-03 07:20 am (UTC)(link)
Sci-fi = technology is the base
Fantasy = magic as the base.

Hard Sci-fi = actual science is being used in some form, so what's going on is plausible in reality, *or* there is a huge focus on the actual technology/science [the two generally go hand in hand.

Soft Sci-fi = everything else that's sci fi.

High fantasy = traditional fantasy, which actually is based on the precedent set by Tolkien's novels.

Low fantasy = all the sub genre's that aren't high fantasy [though there is an argument to be made for a lot of comedic fantasy being high fantasy, since that's what it usually is poking fun of.]

Harry Potter...hmm. That one is hard because it uses the "world within a world" set up, which is a hallmark of low fantasy - but otherwise uses almost exclusively high fantasy standards.

Also, I'd argue that Thor isn't sci-fi since it's main influences are mythology [which was the basis that Tolkien used to form the fantasy genre] and, frankly, only has a passing nod with sci-fi at best. Some of the other Marvel movies are more sci-fi but...well.Thor is definitely the fantasy element to that franchise which, because of him [mainly], is a mix of sci-fi and fantasy.

Recs: Mmm...Mercedes Lackey seems like she'd be right up your alley. She has a lot of Urban fantasy [and historical urban-ish fantasy!] as well as high fantasy that have strong female characters and is pretty well written. Oddly enough, she co-wrote a book with Piers Anthony [Boo, hiss, etc.] that features a matriarchal society that's interesting in that it turns a lot of traditional gender roles on their heads in a way, with a strong female lead [and a love interest that 1. she doesn't fall for right away, and 2. is sort of out of the gender binary in that they change between female and male on a regular[ish] basis.] It's called If I Pay Thee Not in Gold.
Edited (Left out a few words) 2014-01-03 07:21 (UTC)
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

Re: How do you guys define sci-fi and fantasy?

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2014-01-03 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
While it was hinted at in Thor 1, it's Thor 2 that's gone more firmly down the "not gods, just super-advanced aliens mistaken for gods" route.

And thanks for the recs. :)
Edited (I have manners, I swear.) 2014-01-03 07:54 (UTC)

Re: How do you guys define sci-fi and fantasy?

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-01-03 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
High fantasy = traditional fantasy, which actually is based on the precedent set by Tolkien's novels.

It's not traditional, and Tolkien's influence is radically overstated.