case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-03 07:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2558 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2558 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Frozen]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Cabin in the Woods]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Trailer Park Boys]


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














08. [SPOILERS for Elementary]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Zelda comic]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]


















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
















11. [SPOILERS for Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures]
[WARNING for suicide]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

DA

(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
I've read all the Sherlock Holmes stories multiple times in my life, and honestly I can't place most of these names to the stories they featured in. "Prominent" here definitely means "prominent in the public conscious", in which case the person above is correct. Mrs. Hudson and Irene are it, the former for her recurring status and the latter for being iconic. I'd throw Mary Morstan in there as well, arguably. You can't really say that the Girl of the Week counts as a "prominent" female character (even if she is important to that particular case), just like no one is going to argue that John Openshaw (whose name I had to look up even though I remember practically every detail of Five Orange Pips) is as important to most readers as, say, Lestrade.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

True as far as prominence in the sense of personal relationships go, but I wasn't talking about that, I was replying to the obnoxious commenter snidely implying that either there aren't actually many female characters, or that the female one-offs aren't worth remembering.

And I remembered all these names and the stories they came from off the top of my head without looking any of them up, though I've only read the Sherlock Holmes stories two or three times each, a while ago -- and I don't think I have an exceptionally good memory, so I've got to wonder if maybe people just don't pay any attention to client-characters anymore and that's why they don't remember them, given the regrettable devaluing and dismissal of the clients' stories and role in adaptations and fandom (which IMO removes a lot of Holmes's flavor as a helper figure that people go to when they have a problem and makes him into someone whose problems and adventures are all about him).

As for prominence -- the main reason those characters are prominent is because adaptations and pastiches have made them prominent. There's no reason that other one-off characters can't have their roles expanded in new adaptations the way that, say, Irene's role has been expanded in past adaptations.

Not that I'm complaining about the genderbending in Elementary mind you -- I personally think it's a great idea to enhance gender diversity in the actual main cast. The previous comment of mine was a tangent in reply to the opinion of the anon I was replying to, who seemed to think all the female characters there were forgettable. Which IMO, they were not.