[ SECRET POST #2559 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2559 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fingalsanteater]

I actually enjoy creepy ownership tropes, in particular, if the author acknowledges they know the characters are flawed in that way. There's one WIP I was reading that started developing some really awful abusive themes, but in the comments the author responded to the criticism by saying that it was intentional. As long as the author is knowingly writing these flaws, I'm okay with it.

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

I'm usually not, though I'll read most things if they're well handled. And I admit that I only made it a few chapters beyond the point where it started to bother me, because it wasn't changing or even being acknowledged. It's possible that things got better later on, and I just didn't stick it out long enough.

However, the fic was advertised as 'romantic/comedic', which ... doesn't incline me to trust to the awareness of the author? It was genuinely well crafted and the writing was really good, which makes the description/summary really odd unless they actually did think that this development was genuinely romantic as opposed to creepy. (I'm hoping they meant it under the 'romantic' part of the description, bad as that is, because putting it under the 'comedic' part would just be ...).