Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-04 03:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2559 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2559 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Fandom crafts
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 01:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom crafts
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 01:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom crafts
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 04:20 am (UTC)(link)but really, it depends on a) the nature of the fanart (is it porn of children media characters?), b) the attitude/money of the company, d) where the fanart is being sold, e) if it's all the artist sells, f) the volume/amounts of fanart sold, g) if it's just the one individual or an entire company producing and selling
and other factors too, I imagine
Re: Fandom crafts
Merch, on the other hand, based on a fandom is a lot less 'set' in that a lot of people engage in it, and a lot of people capitalize off this original creator's work of fiction, so it's less of an issue. When people individually make and sell merchandise, usually they are so small that the owners of the original work just don't bother doing anything because there little to no 'theft' from either the original work or existing merch vendors who are doing the same thing, just legally, and as such it's not worth the cost of legal action. By the time someone becomes 'big' enough in selling their merch to create any noticeable ripples in merch and profits, they'll often end up cutting a deal with the fiction's ownership company, anyway. (i.e. at my local fabric store - I highly doubt that Marvel actively bothered to make a lot of character-printed fleeces themselves; more likely, someone else wanted to and just cut a deal with Marvel to do so). In other words, the extra merch is little to no loss of profits for the companies owning the work, and can even act as extra free advertising, so they're not going to waste money pursuing legal action.
The reason why fanfic usually doesn't get this same treatment is that it's basically plagiarism to just use another writer/creator's work as your own, and plagiarism is seen as intellectual theft, a rather different beast from thefts of or losses in monetary profits. Of course, in theory a writer can also 'cut a deal', but this usually only works in company-owned fandoms in which the 'fanfic' is basically just a spin-off (i.e. Star Wars and Star Trek, some comic-book novelizations, etc), and even then it only really works if the new material doesn't conflict with the existing work (which a lot of fanfic, if not arguably most, does quite a bit).