Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-04 03:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2559 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2559 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

SA
(Anonymous) 2014-01-05 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)Though to be honest I've never quite understood the bodily autonomy argument and why people zero in on Synthesis because ALL of the endings involve Shepard making a huge choice for the entire population of the galaxy. And making some changes at the molecular level is a lot less questionable to me than genocide, or essentially turning yourself into the galaxy's omnipotent "protector."
(I do think destroy is, unfortunately for me, the best-written ending, in that there is the least wrong with it from a storytelling perspective... but morally I still think it ranks below the other two.)
Sorry for snapping at you, it's a knee-jerk response at this point - synthesis fans get a lot of hate in the fandom, and destroy fans can be particularly obnoxious with their insistence that destroy is ~canon~ and anyone who can't see that is an idiot. Uuugh.
Re: SA
But, anyway, it's cool, we can totally agree to disagree on that angle. And damn sure agree that Destroy is neither canon nor flawless (especially considering the devs are obviously biased towards Synthesis, if anything - I mean, EDI's stunning "I am alive" speech? Please.)