[ SECRET POST #2560 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2560 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Just because certain franchises emphasize one part of his character more than others doesn't make him OOC in those franchises, IMO. I for one was glad to see a greater emphasis on Holmes's physicality in the Downey films.

[(Anonymous)]

That was nice since you don't see many references to Holmes' skill at bare-knuckle boxing and martial arts, but I'm not sure I felt it was a good trade-off because it sacrificed just about everything else. Holmes wasn't a mischievous smartaleck and womanizer, and Downey's version is far more eccentric than ACD's Holmes.

[forgottenjester]

I didn't say the movie was bad. I was actually questioning the validity of all adaptations and saying, "Who the fuck care how much like the book they are? That's why this is an adaptation, not the actual canon." So I really feel people should do whatever they want.