case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-05 03:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2560 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2560 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2014-01-05 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
It's in character to you. I dunno, I think with something like adaptations they can do whatever they want and what is "in character" and what "out of character" doesn't really apply.
tweedisgood: (Default)

[personal profile] tweedisgood 2014-01-06 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Me and really rather a lot of other people, from what I gather, but the question of characterisation is in part subjective, true. But I wouldn't go so far as to say it doesn't matter if they do "whatever they want": surely then it can cease to be an adaptation in any real sense. Semantics, maybe, but an element of truth as well.