Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-09 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2564 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2564 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 01:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 01:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 03:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Unfortunately, smaller bred animals come with lots of health problems and dog breeding shows that specialized breeding can lead to lots of defects and poor overall living. I really think mother nature should be left alone.
no subject
no subject
Also, some breed of cats are smaller, so easier keep and tame. I think hyenas have more carnivorous and have bad temperaments, so that's why we don't have hyenas as pets. But wolves/other gentler subsets might have been easier to tame with the help of food etc.
Moose aren't found all over the world, where different horse breeds are, no? So I guess it has to do with population as well. What our ancestors could get a hold of. I think some animals are just easier to tame or "break" as it is.
I think Moose/hippos/whatever are more dangerous animals as well and that's why we're not riding around on them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 07:30 am (UTC)(link)Also, animals need to a) actually have the genetic potential for humans to select for (ie. a more personable demeanor), and b) be possible to regulate the breeding of. I'm not sure it would have been possible to selectively breed moose in the far past, given how hella aggressive the males get in breeding season plus how huge they are.
There's also probably a big dollop of random chance in there, too.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-11 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)It is actually a combination of factors but the general rules are:
The animals have to be useful. This is the main reason stuff like chinchillas weren't domesticated until the sixties. There is not a lot of meat you can get from them but they made good test subjects.
The animals have to have a lifespan shorter then humans. This is the main reason stuff like elephants are only tamed and not domesticated. People don't live long enough to figure out what animals the should breed.
the animals need to have have a habitat compatible with people. Stuff like giraffes or blue whales is just kind of impossible. This also includes all animals that have strong migration instincts like buffaloes.
And most animals just have behaviour that is incompatible with people. For an animal to be domesticated you need an animals that is used to being in a group and willing to acknowledge others (humans) as it's leader. Most big cats fall in this category because they are pretty solitary. Lions just don't believe people can be leaders. Most dear like animal tend to go in shock easily and don't live in groups.
Generally if something is useful and can be domesticated people will do it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
As for breeding, I have no idea. I assume there would be some dramatic physical changes. Look at how varied dogs have become and how a lot of those breeds look nothing like wolves anymore.
no subject
If there was some computer simulation that work out the effects of domestication on other animals, it would be awesome. We could see all the possibilities without actually harming any of them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 02:37 am (UTC)(link)More questions on the subject
Raccoons would be one animal I'd pick. I think they would be rather cat like, but being able to train them to be service animals awesome. Some interesting colors and fur patterns would be neat.
Bears would be excellent guard animals, and their sense of smell would make them excellent search, and tracking animals.
Re: More questions on the subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 03:17 am (UTC)(link)I think a squirrel would be pretty cool domesticated. But I remember reading a report once where they did a study and came to the conclusion that it was just not possible to ever domesticate a squirrel. This was some years ago so maybe it's been proven wrong, but I was very sad after reading that. Haha.
Re: More questions on the subject
Crocodile! oh oh, Cassowary!
Re: More questions on the subject
Re: More questions on the subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-10 06:41 am (UTC)(link)Just because I like sharks.
Re: More questions on the subject