Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-10 07:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2565 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2565 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
08. [SPOILERS for Shingeki no Kyojin / Attack on Titan]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for The Walking Dead]
http://i.imgur.com/Rnp3pTB.png
[gore in image]
__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for American Horror Story]

__________________________________________________
11. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________
12. [SPOILERS for Sherlock]
http://i.imgur.com/d4tbog4.png
(OP requested link)
__________________________________________________
13. [SPOILERS for Sherlock]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: cw: rl suicide
(Anonymous) 2014-01-13 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)Either way, OP wasn't calling a particular poster out and saying "YOU! YOU THERE! YOUR RESPONSE TO YOUR PERSONAL AFFAIRS SICKEN ME!" OP was commenting on a comic that apparently bothers OP.
Invalidating one person in an after-the-fact attempt to prop someone up, especially someone who was explaining their thoughts rather than asking for anon white knights, has no net gain. It does nothing for either person, especially when you're conflating two unrelated things - OP's reaction to a comic as a consumer of that comic which has nothing to do with Responder and Responder's personal opinions, other than that Responder apparently wanted to discuss it with OP.