case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-16 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2571 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2571 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Revenge]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Vatta's War - Trading in Danger]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dirty Rotten Scoundrels]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Mass Effect]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11. [tb2]


__________________________________________________



12. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #367.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
comma_chameleon: (Why?!)

[personal profile] comma_chameleon 2014-01-17 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
And that's why I said equally loosely. Obviously even identifying bisexuals aren't going to be attracted to exactly 237 men and 237 women.

However, if someone ONLY has an attracted to one single person outside their self-identified sexuality, to me (as stupid as the term is) they're 'only gay for them'. It's an exception in my opinion, not a change in sexuality. Maybe they're attracted/in love with that person in spite of their sex?

Anyway, just saying, sexuality is pretty damn fluid in my opinion, and so are the labels for it.