case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-19 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2574 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2574 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
elaminator: (Spartacus)

Re: badass-tiger AMA

[personal profile] elaminator 2014-01-20 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
If you could make any fandom explode in popularity which one would it be?
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

Re: badass-tiger AMA

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2014-01-20 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh, none. I'm very happy in small fandoms and I can do without the drama a big fandom brings along with it. I like how cosy and close-knit small fandoms tend to be.
elaminator: (Thor)

Re: badass-tiger AMA

[personal profile] elaminator 2014-01-20 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
That is probably the smartest answer you could give; it's true that larger fandoms do tend to be much wankier. There are a couple I would risk wank for if it meant more fanworks, but not everyone is going to feel that way.