case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-21 06:39 pm

[ SECRET POST #2576 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2576 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
siofrabunnies: (Default)

Re: Your Storytelling Pet Peeves

[personal profile] siofrabunnies 2014-01-22 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Epithets that aren't relevant to the current scene. Calling Ron Weasley 'the ginger' only makes sense if his coloring is important information right when it's mentioned (like some random first-year who doesn't know his name is talking about him, or something), and it works a lot better if you're contrasting his coloring against someone else's. Don't just throw it into writing where it's not needed.

And, goddammit, remember that these people have names. Names are how people talk, so names are what you should default to. Saying someone's name over and over is a lot less noticeable than constant epithets.

I have several other rants about it, but I don't want to fill a whole page.