[ SECRET POST #2577 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2577 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald-Crane, from the soap opera Passions]


__________________________________________________



03.
[BBC Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nobunaga the Fool]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia from Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Quick and the Dead]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Nathan Fillion]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Er.

Not appear in one story, but play a significant role in one story, since Mary obviously appears in later stories.

[(Anonymous)]

This is not to say that I don't think Mary was important (and frankly I hate this entire "who was more important" argument and want it to just go away), but I don't think being mentioned offhandedly qualifies as appearing in a story.

[(Anonymous)]

...Not really? I mean she (or one of Watson's other wives - even ACD didn't keep track of how many and which one it was) is only mentioned a little? But never in any important way. She is never the center of the story again, never helps with a case. She marries Watson and then becomes a set piece. Half the time the only differences being around makes is that Watson doesn't live with Holmes.

[(Anonymous)]

IA. But saying that she only appears in one story is technically incorrect and I wanted to fix it. That's all really.

[(Anonymous)]

But she might as well NOT appear in any other story. Being a set piece is not really 'appearing'.

[(Anonymous)]

Technically correct is the best kind of correct.

(Just to avoid confusion here, I was replying to my own post to correct a technical error, not correcting another anon. I agree that she might as well not appear in any other story - but she does appear in other stories, albeit in totally insignificant roles, and so it's technically inaccurate to say that she only appears in one story)

[(Anonymous)]

She's not just a set piece though. She gets characterization. In one, she's seen encouraging Watson to go with Holmes. In another, she's shown caring for the wife of an opium addict.