case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-22 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2577 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2577 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald-Crane, from the soap opera Passions]


__________________________________________________



03.
[BBC Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nobunaga the Fool]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia from Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Quick and the Dead]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Nathan Fillion]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
it's a poem that is pretty famously about the Nazis and they said it had nothing to do with the Nazis

lol @ everything

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
It's a derivative work:

"In copyright law, a derivative work is an expressive creation that includes major, copyright-protected elements of an original, previously created first work (the underlying work). The derivative work become a second, separate work independent in form from the first."

Notice the last line. Independent.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
lol wtf are you quoting law for. this is not a question of law. it might be legally independent, but a reasonable person, seeing the poem is so clearly referencing the specific poem, could legitimately think that the writer was intending to reference the original poem's context. and honestly, i think it's more difficult to imagine they weren't intending to reference it. it really is a pretty specific allusion.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
...are you for real?