case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-22 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2577 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2577 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald-Crane, from the soap opera Passions]


__________________________________________________



03.
[BBC Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nobunaga the Fool]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia from Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Quick and the Dead]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Nathan Fillion]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: So I just read some stuff that "Dual Protagonists are not reccomended"

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, wow. I actively started going "What?" out loud, alone in my room, due to the absurdity of that article.

He raises a few good points. (Mostly that it's adding extra difficulty to your novel, and variations thereupon.)

But seriously, he has a *really* narrow definition of protagonist. Or hero. Or something. He seems to keep flip-flopping on that. "Well, you shouldn't write two protagonists. Or well, there might be two protagonists, but only one is the *hero*. Or maybe you have two antagonists." It's... weird.