[ SECRET POST #2577 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2577 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald-Crane, from the soap opera Passions]


__________________________________________________



03.
[BBC Sherlock]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Nobunaga the Fool]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia from Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Quick and the Dead]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Nathan Fillion]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[chardmonster]

I don't know, actually saying something of substance?

Imagine our exchange if it were about something else.

"My great-grandfather was a confederate but he hated slavery, I'm sure of it."

"So was he an abolitionist? Did he subscribe to an antislavery newspaper? Was he a Free Soiler? What evidence do you have that he hated slavery?"

"HE SAID SO AFTER THEY LOST THE WAR OKAY GOD I DON'T OWE YOU AN EXPLANATION YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE IT ANYWAY [paragraph continues without substance]"

[(Anonymous)]

And I ask you again: Why do you believe I owe you this particular piece of information? Why do you think you are so important that I should have to "give you proof"?

[chardmonster]

I don't think you owe me. I think we're on a message board and you didn't owe me a response to my question in the first place. I think I'm pretty clearly defining "proof" as "you saying something." Did you think I wanted scanned documents or something?

Is this Nuremberg?

I'd like to point out that you didn't refute anything.

[(Anonymous)]

You said, further down, that you were only curious. Had you actually asked like you were, I probably would have answered you. But you basically came and said "I demand you give me evidence to back up your claim" as if I owed you something.

[chardmonster]

And you overreacted a whole bunch and made your grandfathers look like Nazi dicks and still won't say anything substantial.

It seems like a dumb response.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, the only person hung up about how my grandfathers were Nazi dicks is you.

[chardmonster]

You keep coming back to say they weren't (without really saying they weren't).

[(Anonymous)]

No, I pretty much literally said they weren't. You're the one demanding "evidence". And quite frankly, it's ridiculous: You say that you would believe me if I said they were communist or Social Democrats, but you won't believe it when I say they weren't Nazis? Why is one thing more believable than the other?

[chardmonster]

Because "my grandfathers weren't Nazis because ______" is much more believable than "my grandfathers weren't Nazis because they said so, I don't owe you an explanation."

Of course you might fib but, again, this is a fucking message board.