[ SECRET POST #2579 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[ill_omened]

You don't.

There's plenty of limits and regulations around what you can do with a body after the person dies, regardless of what they want to happen.

And really there should be plenty more.

Like people have to opt in to be organ donors (or can opt out?), fuck that.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[siofrabunnies]

Well, obviously we don't have full legal right, nor should we. You don't have the right to have your ashes dumped into a restaurant's food, either.

The right to decide what goes on within your body is just kind of a hot-button topic with me.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

Fuck you. People have reported unexpectedly recovering after they were expected to die and heard the doctors and nurses discussing the imminent preparations to remove their organs, which these days begin BEFORE the heart has stopped on it own to ensure fresher product. THANK YOU, NO.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

Well, as long as the organs weren't already removed...

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this has been the case, and there have been cases where doctors have applied DNR orders explicitly against the wishes/beliefs of the patient/family members. But that isn't the case in this instance, as the woman really is dead, the body is not viable (not even as "an incubator") and neither is the fetus. So, not even remotely the same kind of situation at all.

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, I agree. Sorry, I was digressing there a bit and speaking directly to ill_omened's opinion that there should be no opt-in or ability to opt-out of organ donation. In the case under discussion here, I think it's probably for the best that life support be removed.