case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2579 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Those aren't logical fallacies.

One is them pointing out what they're being accused of by virtue of not agreeing with the pro-choice hivemind, and the way that the issue is being framed.

Two is you having a different opinion to them.
siofrabunnies: (Default)

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[personal profile] siofrabunnies 2014-01-25 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
OP stated their opinion as fact. I'm not sure if there's a formal name, but that seem pretty fallacious to me. Even if it's not technically a logical fallacy, it's still poor argument. You can't just state your opinion and have it be fact.

Pro-choice is not a hivemind. Neither is pro-life. They also phrased the 'way the issue is being framed' as "must", implying that "must be a man who hates women" is the only response, which it isn't.

And, in such a legally complicated situation as this, even pro-choice people might want to keep her alive, because she never said she didn't want the baby. There's a pro-life person below who doesn't see the point in trying to keep the baby alive, because it's almost certainly not got a chance outside the womb.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Two is you having a different opinion to them

Bullshit. Organ donor cards, anon--dead people still get to choose what happens to their bodies.