Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2579 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:50 am (UTC)(link)One is them pointing out what they're being accused of by virtue of not agreeing with the pro-choice hivemind, and the way that the issue is being framed.
Two is you having a different opinion to them.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
Pro-choice is not a hivemind. Neither is pro-life. They also phrased the 'way the issue is being framed' as "must", implying that "must be a man who hates women" is the only response, which it isn't.
And, in such a legally complicated situation as this, even pro-choice people might want to keep her alive, because she never said she didn't want the baby. There's a pro-life person below who doesn't see the point in trying to keep the baby alive, because it's almost certainly not got a chance outside the womb.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 02:21 am (UTC)(link)Bullshit. Organ donor cards, anon--dead people still get to choose what happens to their bodies.