case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2579 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Just asking because I'm curious and because the media here pretty much painted the case as 'nothing more than' statuatory rape, but was there actual evidence of the victim being drugged and forcibly raped aside from her statement?

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
was there actual evidence of the victim being drugged and forcibly raped aside from her statement?

Nah, just her statement. And you know she was lying because what 13 yr old girl doesn't love getting fucked up the ass by a middle aged man???

*eyeroll*

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, physical evidence. There was no doubt and no argument that he had vaginal and anal sex with her and that she had consumed Quaaludes and alcohol. The dispute was that he claimed it was all consensual.