[ SECRET POST #2579 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

I'm curious whether you'd say the same thing if the baby was normal and closer to term? Personally I'd think there's a big difference between providing a few more weeks to a child who has a good chance of surviving and thriving, versus trying to salvage a severely blighted fetus over a span of several months, but that's just me.

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

The way I see it, if the woman is dead and the baby can be saved, that is, taken out of her and put in an incubator if it needs it? Then yes. Do that. If the normal practice is to keep the woman on life support for the last few weeks, okay. I'm not sure how everything would work because I'm not a medical professional, but okay. Basically: do what is best to save the mother and the baby--if one can't be saved, do what is best to save the other. But in this case, the pregnant woman died, and so did her future baby. It was just a slow death. So what's "best", imo, would be to let it die naturally and not drag it out.

I think you and I are basically agreeing, yes?

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Pretty much, yeah.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

DA who agreed

In my opinion, no matter the length of time, any action taken should be the family's decision. There should be no outside debate, legal or otherwise. In this case, if the family had wanted to keep her on life support because they were desperate to keep the fetus alive, in my mind that would have been their choice. Since they didn't, that should have also been their choice. No debate.

Personally, I find the idea of a few days or even weeks more palatable and more understandable than what happened here, but my view of that is irrelevant because it is not my family.