case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2579 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Guess what, your desire to let the baby live is completely irrelevant because the woman's family wants her taken off life support. It doesn't matter that it would've been a situation with an eventual end, the fact of the matter is this is a case of the state intervening into what should have been a private medical decision in a way that would prolong this family's pain for months, in addition to forcing them to incur a colossal amount of medical debt.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Also this.
tasogare_n_hime: (Default)

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[personal profile] tasogare_n_hime 2014-01-25 01:11 pm (UTC)(link)
in addition to forcing them to incur a colossal amount of medical debt.

That's just the cherry on top isn't it? The state made a decision against the family's wishes, but there is about zero chance the state will ever take responsibility for that decision. It's an additional act of torture on top of everything else the family has been through, and there probably nothing they can do about it.