Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-24 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2579 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]

__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
Also, it'd be kind of badass to have a kid who's birthdate comes after your death date. I shall always be a bit of Frankenstein at heart.
Yes, I know "time of death" is technically after they stop the life support. Don't ruin my not!dream.I think more than the corpse part, what'd get to me would be the hospital bills my family'd be left with. So if it went beyond two weeks, I'd leave it up to them.
But even then I think there's a world of difference between "using my corpse to sprint the last 100 meters to the finish line" and "using my corpse to straggle forward before you've even finished the first lap." Especially in cases like this where the fetus was never going to survive anyway, and - on the miracle chance it did - was going to have innumerable life-debilitating defects.
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
(Anonymous) 2014-01-25 03:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
You think it would be badass, for me it's sheer nightmare fuel and a one-way ticket to therapy.
Can't speak about the hospital bills as I'm not sure how that works in the US. But do I get that right, the HOSPITAL refused to take the mother off live support AGAINST THE FAMILY'S WISHES and yet the FAMILY has to pay for it?
Re: When pro-choice is anti-life
I guess it does come down to one's personal views on the matter. The more I think about it, the "corpse" part is the thing that disgusts me least about this case, but rather the state/hospital overriding the family's decisions and the fetus not being viable from the get go. But yeah. To one person, it's kind of badass and no big deal, and for another it's nightmare fuel. As long as it stays that person's (and/or family's) choice, I am totally fine with whatever they decide because I totally understand the nightmare fuel even if I'm not affected by it.
I'd like to think that any offspring I'd have would share my viewpoints, but ultimately I have no idea. And I guess I'd like to take my chances and hope that said offspring would lean more towards the nbd camp than the traumatized camp because then at least they would have a choice of how to proceed.
As for hospital bills, I don't know what they're going to do in this instance, but I know in the US if you're having an emergency, someone calls the ambulance, and you're not in a state to refuse - even if you would've normally refused - they charge you several thousand dollars for it. This is slightly different because the family was protesting outright. Though even then, I wouldn't be surprised if the hospital charged them. In that case, the family will probably turn around and sue the hospital/state because we're probably talking about several hundred thousand in bills. And then it'll be up to the hospital/state to either go to court with the claim and make this even more of a media spectacle, or settle it privately for an undisclosed sum.
AMERICA.