case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-28 06:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #2583 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2583 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #369.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
The 'pro' pedophilia arguments that it's an orientation and only harmful when acted on are so much better it's sort of shameful. Even the ones beyond that are straight dropping respectable meta studies.

Just like here in fact.

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
I have no idea what your comment is trying to say.

-better than what?
-"respectable meta studies"?
-just like what in here?

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Nonny pls basic verbal reasoning would give you the answers. If you need spoon feeding that badly

-better than the arguments that people choose to be paedophiles/are broken into being one/it's a mental illness
-respectable meta studies refers to meta studies, google if required, that are properly peer reviewed
-just like the arguments people were making here a few days ago where we had this exact topic

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
"basic verbal reasoning"?

I'm nayrt, but feel your original comment was not THAT clear. No need to be condescending.

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
So, in your discipline, is it actually considered proper verbiage to use the gibberish phrase "straight dropping?"

Re: 4chan defends pedos as the next homosexuals

(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

"Straight dropping" makes perfect sense.

Or have you not heard the term "name dropping" before?