[ SECRET POST #2583 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2583 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #369.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Really?

I mean, radfem! anon or SJW-type feminism tends not be accepted here, but I would say most members here are liberal and support women's rights.

[(Anonymous)]

As long as your quiet and don't make waves or don't take offense to anything.

[(Anonymous)]

...not really. If you say something, then other people have the right to disagree with it and to say how and why they disagree with it.

It seems to me that by "feminist unfriendly," you mean that people will express disagreement with those who call themselves feminist. But the reality is that two feminists can disagree on a particular issue, and trying to get everyone to think and act the same is kind of antithetical to the notion of civil rights.

[(Anonymous)]

No, they will accuse pretty much any self-described feminists of being shrill, hysterical, humorless, missing the point (which is, of course, always *their* point), in need of a good lecture as to what constitues equality, 'misandrist', 'sexist against men' etc ad nauseam. It's not "expressing disagreement" any more than cutting up someone's tie is a fashion critique.

[(Anonymous)]

It's interesting to me that I've seen that in far fewer cases than you have (not that I haven't seen it at all; there is at least one individual in this thread who used "hysterical"). I wonder where the difference in perception comes from.