case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-02 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #2588 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2588 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #370.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-02 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
"and exclude some of your readers because they are poor. It's shitty business sense"

- Um, no. It's a waste of time trying to sell to money-less people and good business sense to avoid it.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-02 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
She's not even "excluding" the readers who can't afford it; they just have to wait a week.

OP is dumb and should feel dumb. I hope they have been appropriately spanked by the response to this ridiculous secret.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-02 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Seriously. How is "charge everybody nothing" better "business sense" than "charge some people a small amount"?
caerbannog: (Default)

[personal profile] caerbannog 2014-02-03 08:32 am (UTC)(link)
You make a good point anon, how is it shitty to avoid marketing to those who cannot afford it? They're clearly not the target audience, why bother then?