[ SECRET POST #2588 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2588 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #370.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: J. K. Rowling

[intrigueing]

Well, I wouldn't say it's ever "too late"? I'd prefer if authors never said anything like this at all, but at a minimum, waiting until Harry Potter is Not A Thing Anymore should be the least courtesy she could do.

Re: J. K. Rowling

[(Anonymous)]

Pfft. They're her books, she can say anything she wants about them. Now if she was telling the fans that THEY had to stop shipping Ron/Hermione, or pulling all the books off the shelves and replacing them with altered versions, that would be worth getting bent out of shape about, but she's done no such thing.

Re: J. K. Rowling

[inkdust]

This is how I feel about it.

Re: J. K. Rowling

[intrigueing]

Oh, I agree she has the RIGHT to do it, I just find it kind of irritating because she has the capacity to create such waves.

Re: J. K. Rowling

[cbrachyrhynchos]

Nothing wrong with new editions. The work is often better for it. See examples by King and Dahl.

But when she says something in an interview, a perfectly reasonable response is, "If that's what you meant to say, why didn't you make those changes to the text while you were actively editing it?"