Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-02-08 03:39 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-02-08 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2594 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2594 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
__________________________________________________
13.
__________________________________________________
14.
__________________________________________________
15.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
1.) The 4th Amendment deals with searches and seizures. The right to counsel and when it's activated comes under the 6th amendment.
2.) My previous statement was paraphrased from a majority opinion set down by the U.S. Supreme Court, one dealing with this topic no less. But it's interesting that you find it inaccurate.
3.) Good luck on your paper.
no subject
1)I know. You didn't specify whether you meant criminal procedure as a whole or just the Miranda rights issue. So I did specify.
2)Again, which issue? Criminal procedure as a whole or Miranda rights? If just Miranda rights, then as a I said, differing laws may be touted as "more stringent" but practically, then aren't. Again, which topic? Miranda as incorporated against the States, or it's effectiveness in various districts? But I'm happy to read the SCOTUS opinion you're talking about.
3)No paper, I actually study this and interned in this division. But good luck with yours!
no subject