Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-15 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2601 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2601 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Well, OP
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 01:15 am (UTC)(link)I meant the bit before that, about liking the character because he's not sex-obsessed. My rant was more that it's unfortunate that attitudes ascribed to asexuality, or referred to as asexuality, actually used to be status quo for normal human beings, not so very long ago. I think it's only in the last three generations or so (since the hippies) that society and culture has become sex-obsessed.
So what I'm trying to say is, what people call asexuality, the more I see "self-identifying" people describing their experiences with/of it, is actually how people used to be, and this was not considered peculiar or odd or out of the ordinary in any way. I think it's unfortunate that society seems to have lost sight of that, to the fact where it's no longer a default/normal attitude. Albeit one that is much more emphasized on the Internet, helped in no small part by the way media/TV/fiction eggs on the over-sexualization of default society.
Re: Well, OP
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 05:13 am (UTC)(link)I believe you're correct, though, that the trend of overt sexualization is relatively recent. And it's an interesting inverse of the past. Nowadays, there is an expectation that everyone is having sex, and there's something mentally/physically wrong with you if you're not. In the past, the expectation was that you were chaste (unless properly married), and there was something morally wrong with you if you were not.
Re: Well, OP
regardless of how right or wrong you are on this subject, all I see is you taking a confession about someone finding sanity and peace and totally disregarding their feelings because you were so eager to go off on a rant??