[ SECRET POST #2605 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2605 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Slenderman]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Saints Row 3]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Welcome to Night Vale, My Mad Fat Diary]


__________________________________________________



06.
[The Middle]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Steven Universe]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Kyuhyun and Seohyun]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Disney]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Thor: Dark World]


__________________________________________________



12.
[The Avengers/Clark Gregg]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Hannibal]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Fate/Stay Night]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 036 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

-20. I had to select 'social autist' because it didn't seem to take into account... actually being autistic.

Also, this chart is awful and wrong in general.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[starphotographs]

Yuuuuup. (The hell does that even mean!?)

Chart = had weird gaps and seems to run partly on moon logic.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

Aye, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. And there are some pretty huge gaps (such as the one you yourself had to deal with).

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[caecilia]

It is pretty stupid. Apparently being unemployed doesn't give you any negative points, but being a scientist does. And if you're non religious in the US it's -25, but 0 everywhere else. And how are you even supposed to rate your attractiveness?

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[starphotographs]

I have no idea how to rate your own attractiveness! I just checked "attractive face" because... I'm pretty symmetrical and don't have some kind of Harvey Dent deal goin' on?

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

The non-religious in the US sort of make sense just because it's a lot bigger of a deal to people here. You're treated as if you've got some sort of disease (at least in some areas, anyway).

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[caecilia]

We're not the only country that's like that though, and there are countries where it's far, far worse.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

This is true.

So, being non-religious in the US maybe deserves the -25, but the category as a whole needs to be expanded to account for countries where the negative privilege would be even greater.

Really, there's just so much bias in the current chart. And I probably shouldn't be thinking this much about it, because it's a really poor way to measure privilege, anyway.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

Someone here should make our own version.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think you want that.

Really. I don't think you do.

Re: Game: Let's check our privilege!

[(Anonymous)]

Oh I know I don't.