case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-20 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2606 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2606 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-02-21 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
The OP mentioned that one of their problems with the book was that it was written by a Westerner.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2014-02-21 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
That's true. I may be being too charitable towards OP and not enough toward you. It's just that the way I interpreted this whole thing is the way I've seen it go down most often. Of course I'm actually interested in these kinds of discussions so I would have seen more reasonable ones than you.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-02-21 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
I'm honestly just here to enjoy the sweet, sweet irony. Being reasonable isn't really a factor.
sarillia: (Default)

[personal profile] sarillia 2014-02-21 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Then we both win. You get to laugh and I get to enjoy some discussion. :)
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Default)

[personal profile] morieris 2014-02-21 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
As the OP (yeah), I was more talking about how other people found it a problem; and in a way, as has been stated a few times in thread, it is.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-02-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
That clears it up some. Thanks.
Edited 2014-02-21 01:19 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-02-21 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
IT'S LIKE YOU WERE INSPIRED BY YESTERDAY.

All of this de-anoning makes me want to sign up for an account so I can bravely de-anon after submitting a secret.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-21 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
*facepalm* Do you even know how that book is hated by SO MANY ASIAN-AMERICAN WOMEN because white guys try to chat them up by talking about the book to them? The fact that it is written by a white man, showing an ugly level of fetishisation of Asian women, and it's given even more permission for white men to fetishise Asian women they meet. You just love being ignorant because you think social justice is mostly paranoia, don't you?