Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-21 07:25 pm
[ SECRET POST #2607 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2607 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

[Shaun of the Dead]
__________________________________________________
13. http://i.imgur.com/Lnyxfbz.jpg
[link for porny, doujinshi]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
14. [SPOILERS for DRAMAtical Murder]

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [WARNING for rape]

__________________________________________________
16. [WARNING for rape, pedophilia]

__________________________________________________
17. [WARNING for molestation]

[Gatchaman Crowds]
__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for dub-con]

__________________________________________________
19. [WARNING for molestation]
http://i.imgur.com/tm7SaaX.jpg
[Shingeki no Kyojin, molestation scene? in image]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

You must not read a lot, then
(I know this is overly nasty, but I've had a long day and I now have a Pavlovian surge of anger whenever I see the words "Mary Sue.")
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 01:30 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 01:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 02:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 03:18 am (UTC)(link)Books are a blank state. You get in knowing nothing beside the summary (except of course if it's a series).
Totally different expectations.
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 07:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)I remember a discussion like that months ago, abou OCs. I don't mind OCs, I like them in fics, though rarely as main character, but, emotionally, they will never have the impact a canon character that I know and love will have. They're just not on the same level. And sometimes, I just don't want to take the time to fully discover that new character, I just want to read about the characters I know. If I want to read about OCs, well, I open a book.
Re: You must not read a lot, then
The term "OC/original character" has come to mean "MY (the author of this fic's) original character". And some people like them in fanfic, some people don't. It depends on what they want out of the fandom, which very often differs from what they want out of a canon work.
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 03:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 03:19 am (UTC)(link)Prime example: The Draco Trilogy - "Draco" in that story was pretty much an original character.
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 03:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
Except for the random Buffy quotes (which no one in the Potterverse would say), Draco is pretty much a valid and interesting version of Draco for me in that series of stories.
Re: You must not read a lot, then
(Anonymous) 2014-02-22 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: You must not read a lot, then
I realize that this is covered in your "most of the time" caveat, but I still think it's important to explicate: for some readers, the setting and/or fandom tropes (e.g. Sentinels, soul-bonded wolves, etc.) can be more important than the characters. Not everyone's gonna be fannish in the same way, and getting excited about a fandom's worldbuilding isn't any less legitimate than getting excited about its characters.