[ SECRET POST #2609 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

But how do you phrase a rule to capture only those secrets and no others?

Is it just "no secrets with negative attacks on someone's appearance"?

[(Anonymous)]

Like the "I ship it" secrets.

[(Anonymous)]

But "I ship it" is for secrets where that's ALL a secret is saying.

So if this new rule was analogous to the "I ship it" rule, the secret today would still be posted!

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

How about something like "X's [body part]/X is ugly" or whatever?

I mean it doesn't cover today's secret, but I can get behind if there looks to be a reason why they mention they're ugly, but simply saying they're ugly doesn't promote discussion.