fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2609 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

That's completely irrelevant when the person doesn't deserve their name on the list in the first place. It's no one's fucking business, even if we do charge it as a crime, and it's disgusting that they should be labeled as basically a rapist or pervert. The sex offender registry system should exist to protect people from dangerous people. Not as a scarlet letter for people who made the mistake of dating teenagers a year or two younger than them.

What are you even on about? The website doesn't even have these people who committed a minor offense on there. It only registers the dangerous people.

why do you think all sex offender crimes are the same? since you indignantly accused the commenter of trolling.

The ones that involve nonconsensual content or an adult handling a minor with a significant age difference between them (meaning something that isn't even covered in more lenient states with a 5 year difference)? Yes, I consider that all the same and think they deserve to be registered as sex offenders.

okay. so you think things that aren't rape are the same as rape. got it.

The fact that you think a crime involving nonconsensual content, meaning someone in involved is not giving their consent in what ever actions are taking place "isn't involving rape" is creepy as fuck. I didn't think you were a troll, but I certainly hope you're one now.

lol you already said upthread you think all sex offender crimes are equal. And you reiterating that you think raping someone is on the same level as a seventeen year old dating a twenty-two year old consensually (though you kind of backtracked there, as you basically also include a sixteen year old and an eighteen year old in your EQUAL SEX CRIMES definition). Or peeing in public, hell. I think it's fucking offensive that you equate rape with crimes that aren't rape, because rape is a serious fucking crime. I hope you're a troll.

A troll trying to call other people trolls. I'm done here. You're accusing people of things that they never said (such as pulling a 16 year old and 18 year old example out of thin air or peeing in public when I never included that in what I consider a sex offender). I already explained anything within the 5 year age gap that was originally meant for high school students is fine. You on the other had have just admitted you think nonconsensual content is fine and dandy, so please get therapy if you're not doing this out of boredom.

" You on the other had have just admitted you think nonconsensual content is fine and dandy"

holy crap lol

[ SECRET POST #2609 ]

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.

Re: People you thought you knew.