[ SECRET POST #2609 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Except she was wearing their stuff, that's why they ripped it off.

And the stepmother was emotionally abusive, but there was nothing to suggest she was physically abusive. Early in the movie, she thinks Cinderella intentionally put one of the mice in her sister's teacup as a "vicious joke," and by punishing her she makes her do more chores.

If they wanted to imply she had actually hit Cinderella before, that would have been the time to do it.

[(Anonymous)]

Emotionally abusive IS abusive. They forced her to be their slave. There were scenes of physical violence.

[(Anonymous)]

And no one's saying they weren't emotionally abusive. My problem was with the "probably thinks that violence is normal" bit.

[(Anonymous)]

da

But anon is asking if they were actually physically abusive, or if the anons here are blatantly misremembering. They were emotionally abusive, yes, but I don't know where you got that anon was denying that? Was she beaten or something? don't think so..

[(Anonymous)]

Ripping off a person's clothes is pretty physically abusive, even if it doesn't involve hitting. It's a violation of a person's body/personal space, and considering how she was thrown around during the scene, yeah, it was physical.

And toll-non pointed out that she "was wearing their stuff" like that had any bearing on it. Abusers always have a justification for their abuse. "She made me do it" is a classic.

[(Anonymous)]

because you said " destroy her possessions" when they weren't hers, she was wearing their items without their permission.

and are you saying that them ripping her clothes off was a regular thing?