[ SECRET POST #2614 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2614 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Americans]


__________________________________________________



04. http://oi58.tinypic.com/2a5hg1g.jpg
[underage nudity, fanart stuff, harry potter]


__________________________________________________



05. http://abload.de/img/blue1iqs99.png
[porny, liveaction]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. http://oi57.tinypic.com/2ednvhc.jpg
[underage nudity, lolicon stuff]


__________________________________________________




















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
























08. [SPOILERS for Thor: The Dark World]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for True Blood]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Kill la Kill]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Sons of Anarchy]



__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for the Lego Movie]



__________________________________________________






















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
























13. [WARNING for incest]

[How I Live Now]


__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for suicide]

[Robert E. Howard]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

uh.

pretty sure the ending wasn't about a girl but about a toddler?

sure, could have been his little brother instead of his little sister and someday nobody will care which one it is. But I'm pretty sure the joke was intended to poke fun at a toddler bringing their beginner baby blocks to the table.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree, that's how I took that scene as well. The Duplo pieces are more weird in comparison to the 'regular' Lego than the Friends stuff, so the have a more 'alien' look to the Lego world. It wasn't anything to do with the sibling's gender, just their age.

[mekkio]

Yeah, those were Duplo blocks. Aimed at the 1 1/2 - 4 year olds set.

The fact that OP missed that and Princess Unikitty makes me wonder if he/she even saw the movie.

[(Anonymous)]

Now that you mention it, I'm glad the baby sibling was a sister. If it was a brother, it would have excluded real-life girls from being mentioned at all. At least it's implied that the girl will play with the same toys as her dad and brother when she's old enough.

[mekkio]

It made sense that the little girl would play with the "boy blocks" because the brother had no problem playing with the "girl blocks" since it's most likely that Princess Unikitty was his creation.