case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-02 03:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2616 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2616 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
gondremark: (Default)

[personal profile] gondremark 2014-03-02 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
There's definitely a bit of subtext. It's mostly just there for the laughs, and the rest is just cheap pandering to the fangirls (everything about this show is cheap pandering), but it's subtext and it's there. It definitely won't ever be anything more than obvious and pandering subtext, though.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with this. Even if I ship slash a fair bit of the time, I can't stand pandering. It's so demeaning and shallow.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
That's what I figured. But whether or not it's "pandering", those moments are still canon, right? I don't watch the show, again, but if Dean and Cas are having "gay moments", no matter the intention, I don't think the pairing can be considered a ridiculous fan invention or anything.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
na

I don't think the idea of the pairing is ridiculous fan invention, but I think fans who sincerely believe the show is actually going to go there are deluded.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
da

I agree with this assessment completely. It's also why I stopped watching. I dislike the fact that they tease it with 100% no intention of follow-through. (To limit my craziness somewhat, this is not the only reason I stopped watching, just the final straw)
dreemyweird: (murky)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-03-02 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I've always been terrible at telling friendshippy subtext from romance-y subtext (being an asexual doesn't help :/), so... dunno, I'm not sure what the difference is.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure there is a difference.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-02 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Like the anon above said, there isn't much of a difference. People see what they want to see. Some people see close friendship, other people see "twu wuv 4ever." I've seen people parlay a 2-second look into an unspoken declaration of love/lust.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-03 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
Me too! (To every word of this comment. In my mind, Hermione/Ron came way out of left field. I didn't pick up on it at all. I pretty much need someone to state it before I see it.)