case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-03 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2617 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2617 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

As a note, social justice is not a fandom. Tumblr itself is not a fandom.

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
Series 3 of Sherlock was the cause of that. I am still left wondering if the creators did it deliberately because they are really so enamoured of the tweeny little fannits, or because they are terrified of them. (Didn't the kids chase Moffat off Twitter at one point or smth?)

If they had gone back in the direction they started out in with A Study in Pink, the gross migratory (predatory? seems like they destroy every fandom they're in, and salt the earth for good measure) slash fandom would have moved on and found another shiny toy to pick apart. And the rest of us might have had something decently engaging to watch.

...maybe in a parallel universe?

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
At least you're admitting that Moffat and Gatiss are queerbaiting. Some people can't even do that.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

Eh? I've seen the term hurled 1000 times by SJWs and I still don't know what it means. I'm just curious as to whether or not they actually did sell out to the delusional lowest common denominator purely for the money, or if they wrote the hot mess that is 110% fanfic series 3 because they were legitimately afraid there would be actual backlash if they didn't.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I hope the delusional lowest common denominator turns out to be right just because of you, kitten! Although you're correct in that they're delusional if they think Johnlock is actually going to happen on the BBC.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
queerbaiting = somebody (usually the creator/showrunner of a TV series), teasing fans with a slash pairing all the while knowing the show will never make that pairing canon.

At least that's what this non SJW non - Tumblrite has been able to figure it means.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-04 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
Queerbaiting = strong same-sex subtext without any intention of putting it into actual canon and feeling that's enough for representation.