[ SECRET POST #2617 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2617 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

As a note, social justice is not a fandom. Tumblr itself is not a fandom.

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Based on #2

[herpymcderp]

I may have not been articulate enough in my first post there. Oops.

I'mma just copy and paste my reply to vethica:

There's no reason they shouldn't, hence why I couched my statement with the monogamy thing. To elucidate, in most of the stuff I watch/read/play the characters express viewpoints that are in line with the idea of monogamy in relationships, either implicitly or explicitly.

There are a couple of examples of series which never mention any kind of sexual relationships ever which could work, but there aren't many, and then the personalities of the characters I could ship in an OT3 usually don't lend themselves to it.

This saddens me actually, because I do like the idea of polyamorous ships but it seems that they are few and far between in things I enjoy.

I do have a lot of ships that I feel are "open" relationships though.


Yessss. Love triangles don't count and I knew there was a reason I liked you. :3

Re: Based on #2

[kaijinscendre]

Ah. Let me say what I think you are saying just so I am sure.

You don't have any OT3s because the characters you like have expressed that they desire to be in monogamous relationships (or that is the norm in the media at least).


And yeah, not a big fan of love triangles at all.

Re: Based on #2

[herpymcderp]

Yes, that's pretty much exactly what I'm saying. Maybe that's a problem with the type of media I like and a clue that I should be branching out, but it's honestly pretty disheartening. "Get married and live happily ever" after is just pretty boring to write about.