I've seen way too many fair-minded writers get shit on because some element in their story could be taken out of context to mean something that it contextually didn't mean. It's the social justice equivalent of those folks who thought Harry Potter promoted amorality because the villain made amoral statements. Sometimes, there really isn't anything "problematic" about the work that's being decried, and it's unfair to give the people who call it problematic absolute power to decide what its message is.
Re: Repeat after me, kids!