[ SECRET POST #2618 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2618 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [tb]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 039 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Repeat after me, kids!

[feotakahari]

I've seen way too many fair-minded writers get shit on because some element in their story could be taken out of context to mean something that it contextually didn't mean. It's the social justice equivalent of those folks who thought Harry Potter promoted amorality because the villain made amoral statements. Sometimes, there really isn't anything "problematic" about the work that's being decried, and it's unfair to give the people who call it problematic absolute power to decide what its message is.