case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-05 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2619 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2619 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Pushing Daisies]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dallas Buyers Club]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Bravely Default]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Fake & Kuroko no Basuke]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Willem Dafoe]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Dexter]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Rooster Teeth]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Lost Girl]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2014-03-06 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
From what I read here I agree. The only author who I think of as being "hard to read" is Tolkien, and his writing is good, I just hate how long it takes him to move from one thing to another (and I totally get that that's a matter of taste).

(Anonymous) 2014-03-06 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
IMO Tolkein writes like he's seeing it taking place in his head - as if he's describing these great sweeping scenes. The events and places he's describing are absolutely amazing, but the way he describes it can be... dry.
gondremark: (Default)

[personal profile] gondremark 2014-03-06 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
He describes things from an almost Godlike perspective. I like it a LOT, but I also see how other people might want a gritty up-close intensity instead of something vast and sweeping.
Tolkien's writing is very impersonal; you see who does what and how that affects other things more than you see individual people's thought processes. This is true of Lord of the Rings, but even more true of The Silmarillion and the other History of Middle Earth books