[ SECRET POST #2619 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2619 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Pushing Daisies]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Dallas Buyers Club]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Bravely Default]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Fake & Kuroko no Basuke]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Warehouse 13]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Willem Dafoe]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Dexter]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Rooster Teeth]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Lost Girl]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 028 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[caerbannog]

Wow haha, now I'm semi-intimidated to admit I find ACD difficult to parse through. I've read some of them, I think I enjoyed them (it's been about a decade) but I can't say I want to ever read them again.

My reading skills are fine though, thank you, as is my attention span. I also happen to be a big reader. That said, there is just something about ACD's writing style that I find difficult to keep coherent and I somewhat (or maybe quite) resent that this somehow implies I'm not any of the previous. I've always found he goes on and on and on about ~something~, enough that I sometimes need to read a sentence twice, thrice and sometimes go back for a fourth choppy, slow read to determine what exactly he meant. This constant back-and-forthing can be irritating, no matter how interesting the story itself is. Because his writing style is not suited to everyone and most certainly not me. Which says nothing about my, or your, reading skills, attention span or reader 'level'

I'll stick to Jules Verne for when the desire to be a snobby reader strikes me.

*sniff*