[ SECRET POST #2622 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2622 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

DA

No, that's not the same thing as what OP is saying. You have to take context and culture into account when judging a work, or else half the feminist literature of anywhere before like, 1980, is suddenly no longer feminist by today's standards. You can't just dismiss context, make commentary on something from your outsider's POV, then consider the result to mean anything more than one random person's personal, uninformed opinion

It's not about making allowances. It's like someone born in 2000 criticizing Rosa Parks for not doing more than refuse to stand up because if she were a real strong woman by today's standards, she'd have run petitions against the busing companies and staged protests at the bus stops. Context matters

[(Anonymous)]

Uh... Rosa Parks DID do more than refuse to stand up. She had a long history of activism before and after that incident.