[ SECRET POST #2622 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2622 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I have very little interest in defending Madoka, but I don't think a creator needs to be feminist or have feminist intentions for a work to be rich for feminist reading. I mean, Shakespeare wasn't a feminist. He existed pre-feminism. And some of his plays are very skeevy. On the other hand, some of them also lend themselves to very interesting feminist readings.

So, I mean. If people can come up with a compelling argument for why something is feminist, more power to them?

[(Anonymous)]

There is people writing looooong essays about Supernatural, its themes or characterization. That doesn't mean Supernatural has any depth, it's just people projecting. This is the same.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think it's quite the same. Viewing something as feminist generally doesn't require making a bunch of shit up from subtext. It's about what actually happens.