Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2623 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2623 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-09 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)I think if the law is shortsighted enough to get an adult in trouble because a child picked up something they wrote, the problem isn't with the child*. It's with the law. Our laws should be expected to keep up with the times and differentiate between writing porn and creeping on children.
*whether they're lying about their age or not.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-09 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)But if the laws haven't kept up, the responsibility falls to the adult to cover their own ass. And deniability falls steeply if kids are blatantly stating their ages.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-09 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)But if that's the problem, doesn't it seem to you that telling kids to lie about their age, generation after generation, is a really crappy fix?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-09 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-09 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)