Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2623 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2623 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 04:23 am (UTC)(link)Ah. No, it's not bad. And I think I understood you this time.
*rests chin on hand* Fandom is a bigger subset of the population than it's ever been, historically. I think if we reach some sort of consensus that this is unreasonable, then one, it will be a lot harder for politicians to push internet censorship in the name of protecting children, and two, we might find a few people in our ranks who are less susceptible to pressure and want to challenge this directly. That might be overly optimistic of me. But I'd hope not. In the meantime, yes, I get the wariness. I just wish it was expressed as an aversion to threats of lawsuits, rather than an aversion to kids sharing their space.
no subject