case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #2623 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2623 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Cosmos

(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, but Rupert Murdoch only seems to care about this stuff when it suits him.

Look at it this way: science people will love Cosmos. Anti-science people will complain about it on Fox News. Both ways, he wins.

(Also a hell of a lot of conservatives are pro-science, they just end up in the same party as the Ken Ham people because two party systems suck)
ryttu3k: (Default)

Re: Cosmos

[personal profile] ryttu3k 2014-03-11 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Oh god, Ken Ham scares me XD But yeah, it got a good review on the Bad Astronomy blog, so I'll check it out. ...If I can get around the website's US-only region lock. *shakes fist at it*