case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2624 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Outlander]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



04.
[How I Met Your Mother]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Twitch Plays Pokemon]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Overlord]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Red Dwarf]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Pitch Perfect]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Insidious: Chapter 2]


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
cloud_riven: Stick-man styled Apollo Justice wearing a Santa hat, and also holding a giant candy cane staff. (Default)

[personal profile] cloud_riven 2014-03-10 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
If the intent doesn't get across and flies over most heads, and the author gets a butt stain over it, that's more a fail on their end. I don't mind reading authors' notes or explanations on work that might gain from that extra meta/perspective, but I don't think I should have to. There's a difference when someone (a reader) is saying their interpretation is exactly the valid one, and saying it's what it means to them. Don't see what's so big about it.
Edited (a pause trophy) 2014-03-10 23:25 (UTC)
mautradutor: (Default)

[personal profile] mautradutor 2014-03-10 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, the first point is very true. Effective writing means actually communicating intent and meaning. If readers are interpreting intent and meaning into a wildly different by way, then the author has not succeeded in what he or she has attempted to do.

(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Your phrase "gets a butt stain over it" is the best thing I've read all week and I will now steal this from you repeatedly kthx :D
cloud_riven: Cute cigarrette box and coffee cup, with smiley faces, holding hands! Adorable! (caffeine/nicotine = OTP)

[personal profile] cloud_riven 2014-03-11 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
But the week has only just begun D:
I encourage the use of making the junk I say into things.