Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-03-10 07:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #2624 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2624 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
03.
[The Walking Dead]
__________________________________________________
04.
[How I Met Your Mother]
__________________________________________________
05.
[Twitch Plays Pokemon]
__________________________________________________
06.
[Batman, Kill La Kill, Borderlands]
__________________________________________________
07.
[Overlord]
__________________________________________________
08.
[Red Dwarf]
__________________________________________________
09.
[Paranatural]
__________________________________________________
10.
[Pitch Perfect]
__________________________________________________
11.
[Insidious: Chapter 2]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 053 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)Interrogating the Text From the Wrong Perspective
In September 2004, Anne Rice posted a reply on Amazon to critics of her book "Blood Canticle", in which she rejected all negative reviews.[9] Many fans found Rice's response intemperate, jargonistic, and disconcerting, leading to amusing Amazon replies, professional author and editor commentary, and a Fandom Wank post which led to seven pages of comments and an number of icons. The New York Times wrote about it, under the title Fan power takes new meaning.
One line in particular — "interrogating the text from the wrong perspective" — is now a favorite catchphrase on Fandom Wank and elsewhere.[10][11] It is used ironically by fans to mock someone, either the original author of the text using authorial intent to trump what actually appears on the page, or another reader who assumes that there can be only one "correct" interpretation of the text. The text (fanfic or published writing) in question is usually problematic or badly written, and the mocked individual may be the lone defender. See also resistant reading.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-11 04:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject